I understand. I mention this because I know that QCGN and the FCFA do not have access to those closed meetings, and I wonder whether that should be reviewed.
There is another point. As we have seen, the system you use to validate the figures before releasing them failed in this specific case. I am not speaking generally but rather in this specific case. What steps would you take to prevent this kind of error from reoccurring in the data validation process?
After determining that an error had occurred, you had a good system that worked well. Several steps were followed, including verification, validation, analysis, cross-checking, and expert panel review.
Are the same steps taken in normal circumstances?
What happened in this specific case? Ultimately, why did your validation process not work in this specific case?