Mr. Arora, what you just said is true. However, what you fail to say is that the way in which the sampling is working is good for you, but it's not good for the Supreme Court of Canada and the rights holders. That's the reality. Unfortunately, the Fédération nationale des conseils scolaires francophones, or FNCSF, which testified before the committee two days ago, as well as all the other witnesses who were present with them, all say the same thing. That is that all official language minority communities in Canada and rights holders cannot get their rights recognized, because they do not have the right figures to be able to judge the situation. When they go to the Supreme Court to defend their rights, they are always told that they do not have enough statistics.
We ask you to take note of the necessary statistics. I think and we think—tell us otherwise if it is not true—that the questions should be in both the long and short forms. You can't have them in one or the other. We think it is necessary to have them in both forms. Tell us why we are wrong to think that.