Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'd just like to remind all members that the Minister of Official Languages, Ms. Joly, has mentioned several times that the committee is completely independent and that she even did so in the House of Commons.
Once everyone is aware of this, we can make the decision to undertake a study as a committee, as we have done several times in recent years.
That we don't like the premise of the motion is one thing. I'd like to ask Mr. Arseneault if he has a proposal to make. As I understand it, he is not bothered by the substance of the motion, but his premise is troubling. We could accept an amendment that would change the premise.
It isn't a question of judging the motion itself and how it's written, but rather of bringing all the players together to really get the answers to the questions raised by the controversy about WE Org. We'll put the question to its representatives. Let them come out and prove to us that they are bilingual and capable of providing bilingual services across Canada. Unfortunately, it takes more than a website to do that.
Mr. Arseneault, do you have a different premise to propose? We're open to the idea of an amendment to change the premise of the motion. We'd like our committee, which is independent, to go ahead and vote to undertake this study starting next week or on one of the dates mentioned by Mr. Beaulieu. We're not three days away. The date isn't an issue.