Thank you, Dr. Stoll.
So that means that our equipment is the minimum. Yet we are 338 members of Parliament, and God knows we save a lot of money by meeting virtually. However, it's essential to have quality equipment. It should be mandatory for MPs.
What you're saying is that we should have quality headphones. At my office, I've provided my team with some, and I find that their headsets look better than the ones we received from the House. Sometimes it's worth the investment. Thank you, Dr. Stoll.
The Zoom platform therefore poses challenges for interpretation. Do you think we should continue to use the Zoom platform and ask this company to provide us with more powerful versions?
Do you think there's a better platform?
I understand that the House of Commons system is excellent. Do you advise us to migrate to a platform other than Zoom that would offer better sound quality, especially in an interpretation context?