I heard what Mr. Beaulieu said to us about the subamendment. However, talking about the federal government's language efficiency—if you could use the word “efficiency”—and its impact on provincial legislation will inevitably lead to us evaluating it, or studying it. Did I correctly understand Mr. Beaulieu's comments to mean that we should not do that? This worries me a bit. I'm not sure I understand the subamendment.
I'm not opposed to it, but I'm not sure whether I understood what Mr. Beaulieu was trying to explain to us. It is impossible not to evaluate or study provincial measures that will interact with federal government policies.
That is why I felt that Ms. Lalonde's previous amendment did all that simultaneously. That's my two cents' worth.