In that case, the point of order would have been admissible if proposed in this committee.
I think this procedure was previously used, not so long ago. I'm talking about when a motion is substantively similar to another. I understood that it had been proposed both here and in other committees. I am less interested in the other committees, but it would be another matter if it had been done here. Since that's not the case, a point of order is inadmissible.
Thank you. It was legitimate, but since no similar motion was presented here in this committee, it doesn't work.
Mr. Godin, you have the floor.