Before giving you the floor, Mr. Godin, I'm going to finish my obiter dictum.
I reject Ms. Gladu's amendment, although I understand that the first paragraph is worded differently. I think it's perfectly legitimate. However, in my opinion, it is out of order, given that, in the other two paragraphs, exactly the same thing is being requested as what was proposed in the amendment that was defeated.
That said, the rules give the chair a great deal of latitude in making decisions. For the reasons I mentioned, however, I find the amendment out of order. Two out of three paragraphs are similar, which has influenced my reasoning.
Therefore, I rule the amendment out of order.
Mr. Godin, you have the floor.