Mr. Iacono, I understand your comments, except that we must consider the motion as a whole.
Mr. Dalton has the floor, and he's been explaining that he supports or agrees with one of the statements in the motion, namely that “the Committee recognises that French is just as important to Canada's bilingual status as English, and that French is indispensable to the Canadian identity.” That is part of the motion and of the whole. I think that Mr. Dalton always brings us back to this point to tell us that he agrees with that.
The motion as such, in its entirety, is indeed much broader than that. However, I can't interrupt a debate when it concerns the motion directly or indirectly, if the arguments or the debate are still related to the motion.
Mr. Dalton, you have the floor.