Mr. Beaulieu, I was explaining to all members last Tuesday that there are two situations where a chair has a duty to interrupt someone who is speaking on debate about an amendment or subamendment: when they are repeating themselves, or when they are getting off topic.
At this point I consider that you have thoroughly covered the issue. I don't think you can convince us any further as to why you are proposing your subamendments, unless you have something new to tell us. You have moved your subamendments and you've made your point.
Is there anything you want to say that we should hear but haven't heard yet? If not, we need to move on.