Mr. Beaulieu, I will answer that.
At page 542, House of Commons Procedure and Practice tells us about cases where a subamendment goes beyond the amendment itself. Let's keep in mind that Mr. Godin's amendment sought to modify point four of Mr. Serré's motion by changing the date in it. The amendment reads as follows: 4. the committee proceed with clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill no later than Tuesday, November 29, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. ET;
The amendment therefore replaces November 22 with November 29. That's the subject of the amendment.
Page 542 tells us that a subamendment cannot enlarge upon the amendment. I'll give you a hypothetical example: Mr. Généreux could have proposed December 3 instead of November 29. Mr. Godin's amendment consists in the change of date. This is not about inviting witnesses or specifying which ones.
Is that clear to you? The decision I have to make concerns the form and not the substance of Mr. Généreux's subamendment, which I'm not criticizing.
I'll go back to Mr. Généreux.