Evidence of meeting #39 for Official Languages in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was meetings.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Niki Ashton NDP Churchill—Keewatinook Aski, MB

Thank you.

I also think it's important to clarify that we may oppose the amendments being proposed. It seems quite clear to me that we're wasting time discussing amendments rather than putting them to a vote.

As I said about 15 minutes ago, I have a proposal to make to alter the dates so we can have a realistic agenda, one that suits our calendar. Certain members of the committee clearly don't want to move on to that stage. I'm opposed to the amendment moved on that subject. I'd like to go to a vote so we can resolve this major situation or dilemma and move our study of Bill C‑13 forward.

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Thank you, Ms. Ashton.

Yes, we need to proceed one step at a time. That's how we'll be able to keep track.

I'll give the floor to Mr. Godin first, and then it will be Mr. Beaulieu's turn.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

I agree with the comment made by my colleague Ms. Ashton, who is participating virtually in this meeting.

She said that some members aren't cooperating in moving this matter forward. I won't accept any blame for that because, once again…

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Mr. Godin, I—

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

…if we erase our differences and start over, we'll be able to do so on a more productive basis. What stands to gain from that? The French language.

I know that Canada has two official languages, English and French, but French is the more vulnerable of the two.

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

That's great, but—

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

So that's my focus.

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

I will ask all the members to focus on Mr. Beaulieu's second sub-amendment.

Do you wish to add anything to that, Mr. Beaulieu?

12:35 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

I just want to say that, if we had preserved the initial understanding among the opposition parties, we wouldn't have had all these problems since—

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

I'll stop you there, Mr. Beaulieu.

I'm going to start being more strict—

12:35 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

So I'm going—

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

We are focusing on your own sub-amendment.

12:35 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Then let's vote.

You can't tell me I don't compromise.

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Good.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Mr. Chair, I would just like to take you back to June 13 of this year. A motion had been adopted, point e. of which read as follows. I'll read it out loud so I'm not accused of being in bad faith.

e. the committee meet in camera after 20 sessions with witnesses to discuss…

We were talking about dates at the time—

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

I'll stop you there, Mr. Godin.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Why?

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

We are on the second sub-amendment. Do you have an argument you want to advance regarding the sub-amendment proposed by Mr. Beaulieu?

I just want to prevent you from—

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Mr. Chair I will yield to your authority as chair and wait for another opportunity to repeat what I just said. Thank you.

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

That's good.

Are there any further comments on Mr. Beaulieu's second sub-amendment?

(Sub-amendment negatived: nays 10, yeas 1)

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Mr. Beaulieu, you still have the floor to discuss your third sub-amendment?

12:40 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

The third sub-amendment concerns point 4 of Mr. Godin's amendment. I move that the words "no later than Tuesday, November 29" be replaced by "the meeting following the final witnesses." The result would read as follows:

4. the committee proceed with clause-by-clause consideration of the bill the meeting following the final witnesses.

That's essentially my last sub-amendment.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Go ahead, Mr. Godin.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Mr. Chair, my colleague Mario Beaulieu's sub-amendment is relevant. It's consistent with what we proposed in the notice of motion, which has now been made public. I think it's entirely logical to act in that manner. We can't submit amendments until the witnesses have completed their testimony. If we want to proceed to clause-by-clause consideration, we'll have to wait until the testimony phase is complete. Then we can begin clause-by-clause consideration.

Since I don't know whether it's time to do that, you'll be able to remind me if I exceed my speaking time. I'd like to discuss the clause-by-clause consideration. May I do so?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

You may since that's part of this sub-amendment.