Thank you for your question.
As I said earlier, Treasury Board's role will be that of central agency for ensuring compliance and for evaluating and monitoring the various federal institutions.
Treasury Board is in a good position to play a greater role internally, while the Department of Canadian Heritage will be better able to play a role externally, since it has expertise in the field.
As I said earlier, Treasury Board will be able to enforce and establish standards and monitoring elements across the government. The Department of Canadian Heritage will focus its efforts on programs and its commitment to stakeholders.
I will give you an example.
The office of the Department of Canadian Heritage, throughout Canada, gives it expertise in the field, while Treasury Board is only present in Ottawa. As you know, it would not be effective for a body like Treasury Board to be responsible for program implementation and also be in charge of compliance by federal institutions. To clarify, the Department of Canadian Heritage could not handle compliance by federal institutions. Treasury Board will be responsible for that.
You may have already heard from people like Linda Cardinal and Michel Bastarache, who also agree that Treasury Board Secretariat should not have sole responsibility for the Official Languages Act, although its role must be strengthened.
As well, as we said, we are making an essential change, and Treasury Board will have the job of holding federal departments accountable for using positive measures to promote the official languages.
In addition, as I think we have clearly shown, Treasury Board is the best central agency to handle that responsibility.