Thank you, Mr. Housefather. I see that the jurist and committee chair is very good at this.
You are correct, Mr. Housefather, but there was a grey area when we adjourned without completing debate on the amendment. To act logically, we could withdraw amendment BQ‑1 with the unanimous consent of the committee, and it would be replaced by amendment BQ‑0.1 and amendment BQ‑1.1. It's true that that would be the logical order in which we should proceed, unless you propose something else. I turn to the experts in the field. They are giving me the nod that this is indeed the right way to proceed.
Do we have unanimous consent to allow Mr. Beaulieu to withdraw amendment BQ‑1, which he moved at the last meeting and on which we were unable to complete debate?