Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Parts VII and IV are obviously important. They address both official language minority communities in the country.
However, I have a concern about the impact of repeating general provisions that are already in the interpretative provisions. The protection and promotion of French is mentioned in the act for certain locations, but not for others.
I'm not a legal expert or a lawyer, but I'm wondering whether that might lead to interpretation problems in court. Could one of the government officials perhaps answer this question?