With respect to the first issue you raised, you're referencing legislative asymmetry, which seems to be part of Bill C-32. The goal of Bill C-32 is to achieve substantive equality, and I think those two concepts are quite different. Substantive equality is well defined by the Supreme Court in terms of how we can achieve substantive equality between linguistic communities. It doesn't mean we have to do the same thing for each community. Legislative asymmetry means that you bake into the legislation rights for one group and not for the other.
On February 9th, 2022. See this statement in context.