In spite of that, Ms. Tait, what could have caused that person to make that decision? That's why we want to hear from the other two witnesses we requested. The Chair explained it clearly: we aren't interested in the general aspects of their everyday work.
What was the basis of the decision made by that person within your organization. If it was a reflexive response, could it potentially occur again?
I'm asking a basic question. In addition, remarks were then made about avoiding the Quebec accent. You referred to that earlier. I'm going to restrain myself because otherwise I might make some unpleasant comments, but, sincerely, between you and me, those remarks were insulting not only to both the Standing Committee on Official Languages and the Quebec and Canadian French language, but also to the entire population of Quebec and particularly Quebec artists.
I hope this kind of incident never occurs again because it's a downright insult to the Quebec nation.