I'll go back to the first part of your question.
First, our compliance rate is very high: We're making a lot of effort. Instead of penalizing a company that isn't perfect, it would be better to start by looking at what obligations other companies might have.
As for the penalty amounts, the act provided for $25,000. That was doubled in the regulations. As I said in my opening remarks, that can be very significant when it comes to transporting 50 million passengers a year and having 400,000 flights a year. Yes, that amount can become significant. In the case of certain routes, it can lead to higher costs.
We have a compliance program, and we're going to do everything we can to avoid fines. In other words, we aren't looking to get them. For us, paying fines because we don't comply with obligations isn't a business model. I have heard comments to that effect, and I just want to clarify one thing. Our business model doesn't include any sort of regulatory obligation.
I don't know if Mr. Barbeau would like to add anything to that.