It wasn't clear to me. Technically, if you want to move a dilatory motion, you have to use specific language, and I didn't hear it. We can review the transcripts to see if I missed it. I didn't hear that language, which is why I let you speak for two minutes. Honestly, it was really to give you the freedom to express yourself, because I could see that you had something to say.
That is my response to you, Mr. Godin.
That is also my response to you, Mr. Beaulieu.
Therefore, I move that we vote on the dilatory motion.
Does it please the committee to adopt the motion?
(Motion negatived: nays 6; yeas 5 [See Minutes of Proceedings])