To answer that question, I don't actually have concrete data to say that it's x numbers of dollars to do this or x numbers of dollars to do that.
I don't disagree with you. I believe you said that the train has left the station, and we've been researching this issue for many years. The 2004 report, which is 600 pages long and has dozens and dozens of recommendations, was clearly a substantial piece of work. At FETCO, my predecessor was quite involved in that process. We didn't necessarily agree with all the key recommendations that came out of it, but we certainly were a part of it.
In terms of measuring the overall impact for where we need to go next when we look at the proactive versus the current model, what we're saying is that we have a system right now under the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It's not perfect, but it does exist. Also, we're not just talking about the cost of business; we're talking about the cost of government. If government is going to invest in something new to try to take this further and narrow this gap even more, which we all agree is a great idea, we question whether building a whole new system under a whole new bureaucracy is necessarily the thing to do.
For us, it was just common sense to think that if we're going to build a whole new thing, that's likely going to cost us more. Also, we're all going to have to learn the new processes to make that work, and it's going to take more time to figure it all out than it would if we were to try to improve the processes currently in place to try to bridge those gaps.