First of all, there are a number of methodologies and calculations, most of which have been based on studies that were done some time ago and have not been updated to current numbers. I want to be clear, though. When I mentioned earlier progress that had been made—you mentioned that the banking association said progress was made—I did not cite that progress in any way, shape, or form to reduce the imperative of addressing pay equity. In some ways when you are addressing these issues, it's sometimes the last 9% that is the toughest and requires real action. I didn't cite it from the perspective of a self-congratulatory thing that we have inertia here. I just want to make that clear. There has been some progress.
Even on the issues of gender-based analysis, the decisions rendered by a cabinet with gender parity are better decisions that are more reflective of the diversity at the cabinet table. That goes to any decision-making table whether it's in a caucus room, a committee, or within a department or agency of government. On an ongoing basis we need to be rigorous in terms of demanding progress and measuring progress, and that's where the evidence comes in.