With respect to the team that would be involved in the decision-making along with the patient to see whether or not the criteria were met, I think my friend has addressed that.
Where we would consider a panel or a board, such as the Consent and Capacity Board here in Ontario, would be where decision-making was required to be appealed, where the patient who was making the request was refused by the clinical team, the advisory team that was in place. It would be a place to go where the issues or the point of contention could be heard and properly addressed. As to the make-up of that committee, here in Ontario we have a psychiatrist or a medical practitioner, a layperson, as well as a lawyer. The combination seems to make sense. The competencies of that tribunal could certainly address these types of issues, although they are extremely complex and certainly new to that board.
The other aspects...perhaps if it's not an appeal, but there are certainly issues that come up in the context of the process itself, we would look to that board or that tribunal as well.