Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My question is for Mr. Gunn.
We have often heard witnesses call Carter a floor decision, meaning that physician-assisted dying could be taken even further than it was in Carter. I imagine that argument stems from the fact that the Supreme Court stated that the circumstances of the case were the only facts it considered in coming to its decision.
In light of facts other than those examined in Carter, how would you determine the age at which a minor was deemed to be competent or have the capacity to make such a decision?