Thank you, Professor Hogg, for your presentation.
One of the tasks that Parliament will have to grapple with is this definition, provided in the Carter decision, of a grievous and irremediable condition.
I'm wondering about your opinion on the flexibility that Parliament has, for example, to impose a terminability limitation or criterion in legislation, having regard to the Whatcott decision, wherein the Supreme Court of Canada held that a high degree of deference would be afforded to Parliament in passing a complex regulatory response to a social problem or matter.