Thank you for your question.
We are completely opposed to the proposition that there be a requirement for any sort of prior approval that goes beyond a patient and their physician coming to a decision on treatment, and of course it's the patient who will be making the decision and the physician who is going to provide the treatment.
We think it's a violation of people's privacy rights. It's completely different from anything we do in other kinds of end-of-life care. It's not the standard that's been used almost everywhere around the world but for one country, and there our evidence is a little scanty, as you will remember from a few meetings ago.
We do not endorse that. In fact, we quite oppose it. Also, we think that has a great potential to put in place barriers that for some people may be insurmountable, not only in rural and northern areas but also in cities. As I said earlier, we've seen these kinds of barriers before in relation to medical decisions that really should be autonomous decisions for a patient.