I haven't yet, but I think we're talking about two different thresholds here. The threshold in number two is “clearly violate”, and it's the analyst's opinion—the expert's opinion—that it does not. I'm not a lawyer. I don't think I'm in a position to suggest that the recommendation from the analyst is incorrect.
I think what Mr. Toone has been saying is that it “may violate” the charter, not “clearly violate” the charter.
I'm not going to put words in your mouth, Philip.
In your argument, which has some merit potentially, I'm not sure it got to the threshold of “clearly” violates, which is what we're being asked to vet on this. That would be my two cents' worth.