I find it hard to answer on the basis of this one particular contract. I think it's very clear that this contract was not managed in the way one would expect, afterwards. We point to such things as the reconciliations and the assurances that the billings were actually for the services. The departments have agreed with these observations.
We will obviously continue to monitor other contracts across government, and I would hope that the conclusions in those cases would not be the same as in this case.