Mr. Chair, I would hesitate to get into the specifics.
Let me say, with all due respect to Mr. Williams, that this is a contract that has been issued with substantially incorrect business volumes. If it is a contract where bidders don't understand what the services are to be delivered and seem to have materially different opinions on that question, does this not raise the whole question about how fair and equitable this whole process has been?
Perhaps rather than getting into the specifics of whether it should be 0% or 8% or 9%, or whatever percent, I would say that if government is of the opinion that this is what the contract says, they should have the contract respected, and those people who paid for those property management services should be reimbursed.
I think this is one more indication that this whole process was not fair and equitable, because obviously the two bidders believe different things, as does the government department, as does our office, as does the current supplier.