I have a couple of other questions, Mr. Walsh. Contrary to my understanding, you mentioned—or it might have been Mr. Tardi—a distinction concerning whether or not a witness was sworn in before this committee. It is my understanding that a witness who testifies before this committee is deemed to be giving testimony under oath, and that there really isn't much difference whether or not some member asks the witness to be sworn in.
But when you talked, I had the impression that I'm not right in my thinking. Can you explain that further?