I can't speak for them, but I'm assuming they came forward because they genuinely believe in what they're alleging and what they're proposing, and they have every right to do so. But I believe they have a duty to corroborate these unsubstantiated and baseless facts.
You keep referring to Mr. Macaulay. I explained how I dealt with Mr. Macaulay. Mr. Macaulay was given a secondment, and then he came back into a very good job that I actually.... If I were punishing Mr. Macaulay, I certainly would have taken action to prevent his going to a very good job. I actually had no say in where he was going. He was requested by Assistant Commissioner Darrell LaFosse, who wanted him, and he went there. I had absolutely no say in that whatsoever.
I can't explain why people are coming forward and making these statements. I can only tell you what I knew and how I acted based on that information. Some people may disagree with the actions I took, but as I said in my opening statement, it is a quantum leap to disagree with someone's managerial decision and to take that disagreement to mean that there's a cover-up or that somebody's been involved in a criminal matter. That is what I'm stating here today.