Yes, this was after I had taken the decision, based on Mr. Lewis's complaints, to do the audit. The audit was already in progress. Subsequent to that, Chief Superintendent Macaulay sent me a correspondence on July 4, I believe, in which he reiterates that he shares my concerns for what's happened and he agrees with my decision to do an audit, which is somewhat contrary to the statement he made at this committee on March 28. Here he said, "...any reasonable person would have suspected criminal activity”. So there seems to be inconsistency in what he says in the document that he sent to me and the document to the chief auditor, in which he supports the audit. As a matter of fact, in one of the documents he recommends that a second audit be done in order to get to the bottom of this. I totally agreed. We needed an audit to verify these allegations.
On April 16th, 2007. See this statement in context.