Thank you very much, Chair.
Again, let's differentiate between supporting the right of someone to place a motion versus whether or not you're going to support the actual motion. These are two different things.
Here's my concern, and I hope you will give the mover of the motion an opportunity to respond. We already know that there's conflicting testimony around what happened in terms of what orders were given or not given and rescinded or not rescinded. That's not in question.
I have a whole list of other issues. I think this whole committee does, for the most part, because we overwhelmingly supported the notion that we need a public inquiry. We believe this because we know that a lot of work has not been done. We're not going to be able to conclude all of it through this committee. So my concern is not that the issue isn't justified, but that there are many issues that would come under that same category.
We've already said there needs to be a public inquiry. The government has disagreed. We're dealing with what they have the power to put in front of us. Could you please give Borys a chance to respond? Why would this be any different from a whole myriad of unresolved issues that many of us believe would be properly dealt with by a public inquiry, and only by a public inquiry?
But that is not going to happen. That's my concern.