No. I had the meeting because at the time, if you look at Mr. Pigeon's opinion, he had talked to a number of different people already. He had formed some preliminary views, and I felt it was important—because I knew the issue was complicated and that more than lawyers would have views on it—that all those I could determine might have some views that should be weighed be there.
So the meeting was held, and Mr. Pigeon, as I recall, outlined the state of his thinking at that time. Then there was an opportunity for anyone who had any views or things he should consider, or any contrary views, to express them.