I am thinking, for example, about the $39 million spread over 15 years. It is a situation that appeared abnormal in the eyes of the authors of the report, that appears abnormal to us as well, and that titillates us. It is the reason why we have heard from experts and extended a meeting. During the last meeting, I asked for an explanation that seemed highly technical to me, and that I should have interrupted.
What leads a department to make a decision like that when we know that there is something abnormal and immoral about it, although it is legal? How do you approach the situation to make a decision like that? How can we make sure it does not happen again?