I think procedurally we're at the point where the member is seeking unanimous consent, and I would like to ask a question prior to that vote.
My question would be both to the mover and to you, Mr. Chair. If I'm understanding it correctly, you're talking about staff changes that have taken place and that there are concerns being raised. Those concerns deserve to be looked at. My only concern is whether we are the right body. For instance, if we already had the civilian oversight board in place, that would be the right place to go. I don't necessarily know what that is right now, but I have some concern strictly from a jurisdictional point of view.
As we know the mantra, we are a committee of accountability, not management. We dealt with an Auditor General's report ad nauseam, and we stretched our mandate as far as we could. I'm not sure that any human resources issues that might ensue from that are our responsibility; it gets us one step away. That's my concern. It's not that it should not be looked at, but whether we are the right body. My gut is telling me no.