This is how you're trying to tell me the Government of Canada does business. Now we know the Government of Canada does not do business this way: by squeezing the landlord down because you have some bids from the competitor, saying they're charging x, so if you charge x less a few bucks, you can stay. That is not how the government does business.
As Mr. Christopherson says, there are some serious motivations here. Claude Drouin can interject with a letter, as pointed out, turn the whole system upside down, and you call this following the rules. By your own statement you said, to my first question asking if the rules had been respected...the answer, of course, is that by virtue of a letter from your colleague, the secretary of state who sits in cabinet with you, all the rules were turned upside down. So how can you tell us the rules have been respected?