No, I'm not going to do that. That's a question of debate, Mr. Sweet. The issue has been going on for some time now, and it's difficult to say who's right and who's wrong.
It's a dispute between the Department of Public Works and Government Services and the Office of the Auditor General. There's no question, my own view was the Office of the Auditor General was right when it wrote the report. Public Works is stating that subsequent to that there's new and additional information, mainly renting of the premises at Place Bonaventure that lessened the amount referred to in the Auditor General's report. I'm not exactly sure. I'm going to ask the analyst to comment. He's following it much closer than I am.
Do you have any comment on that particular issue? There's no point in bringing in the Auditor General.