Okay.
I want to zero in on one chapter of the report of the Auditor General, which for me is the most problematic. I'll quote a good part of it here. It's paragraph 3.30, and I'm sure you focused on it too:
Each region, however, uses different risk management techniques and processes to assess risk. Managers do not always analyze all of the risk indicators listed in the Frequency of Inspection Policy Document and may use other indicators that are not listed. Methods range from formal to informal: Some regions have created their own risk indicator databases, some document the decisions made in the risk analysis process in detail, and others make decisions without documenting details, such as the rationale.
The last sentence I want to quote is the most troubling one:
The use of different indicators and methods increases the likelihood of reaching different conclusions for similar situations.
Now, you've responded to that and you have agreed. I'm very glad you have. You've also said that you created the working group in May of 2007 and it has to have a final report in April of 2008. My first question: is that report completed?