The first is addressed to Deputy Commissioner George:
That on or about September 19, 2003, at or near Ottawa, Ontario, you did conduct yourself in a disgraceful manner that could bring discredit on the Force. During a meeting with Chief Superintendent Fraser Macaulay, you advised him that he was on an island by himself and that others would not tell the truth. You explained that Chief Superintendent Macaulay was naive to think anyone would stand beside him in this type of situation. This is contrary to subsection 39(1) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Regulations, 1988.
Number three:
That, between February 21, 2007, and March 28, 2007...you did conduct yourself in a disgraceful manner that could bring discredit on the Force in that, knowing that you had been involved, directly or indirectly, in Staff Sergeant Mike Frizzell's removal and knowing that I had undertaken, as Commissioner of the RCMP,
—that's Commissioner Busson speaking—
to provide the Standing Committee on Public Accounts with all of the information pertaining to Staff Sergeant Frizzell's removal, you failed to inform me, your superior officer, of the above. Failing to disclose the extent of your involvement resulted in an incomplete response being provided to the Committee. This failure to disclose your involvement is contrary to subsection 39( I) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Regulations, 1988.