So there's progress going on out there, all the while looking at the potential for a failure. I know that if there is a failure with pension cheques, many of the recipients go right to the telephone to register their discontent.
I will take a moment to focus on the Parliament buildings issue. As I walked up to the Hill this morning I said to my assistant that it must be tough finding stonemasons and materials to rehabilitate these buildings, because they were built 100 years ago and you can't get the stuff at Home Hardware.
We've had a chance to discuss this in other locations, but it seems to be your view that Parliament itself should generate the leadership so there's no confusion later or during the process about who's really in charge. Parliament itself is a two-headed monster. It has the Senate and the House, and we're used to working together sometimes.
As you looked at this, did you have the opportunity to scope out the possibility of the kind of mechanism where Parliament, the Senate, and the House, would say, “Okay, Public Works, Treasury Board, we're going to take over the management of all these projects”? Did you scope that out with any of the players?