That is also true for Environment Canada and Citizenship and Immigration Canada. One would hope that during such a difficult and necessary exercise one could depend on quality evaluation functions. Yet the report tells us the opposite.
I'll sum up the main conclusions. Only 5% to 13% of programs have been evaluated, and more than two-thirds of those evaluations lack adequate data in order to be effective. Yet this morning we are being told that since the Auditor General's report came out one year ago significant progress has been made. The report states that Treasury Board has made little progress in "developing tools to help departments address the longstanding problem of insufficient data", and, later on in the report, that it did not issue "adequate guidance or tools".
Do you still say this is not true?