We work with the different CIOs and different departments constantly and continuously on many different issues. We do have a view of many different pressures, in both infrastructure and applications across the community...and a number of strategies to implement that. In fact, over the last three years we've been working through the MAF process to reinforce the necessity for the CIO in each department to have IT investment plans in accordance with the government policy on investment planning. In fact, in the last round of MAF, we specifically asked them to identify aging IT as a pressure.
What we have not yet done is we have not yet aggregated specifically the inventory of mission-critical systems across the government; prioritized them in some format; and/or aggregated the total investment that might be required once we really normalize what people mean by mission-critical, whether they are in fact key priorities of every department. That will take some time. It will take the time that we need to consult with the community, agree on what is a priority individually by department within their portfolios, and bring that back.