The reason I ask this question is that I noticed in the one statement from Mr. Horgan--and I thank you--in here. This just gives me an example of where we seem to be in gridlock again. You mention here:
...the Department did indicate...whether there are circumstances where it would be appropriate to bring forward subsequent draft technical amendments when the previous...bill is still pending before Parliament. The concern...is the need to protect against confusion and complexity....
In other words, if we can't potentially bring in new bills when we haven't dealt with the old bill because we're going to create a problem, are we sitting in that never-ever? We can't bring in a bill because we're going to impede what is already in there. We're into the chicken-or-the-egg theory on this. Somehow we have to break this impasse and move forward.
What are your thoughts there?