I thought you just said you knew it would be about $100 million. It's one thing to say that notionally there may be an added cost, but when it's going to double the cost, wasn't there some obligation to give a greater heads-up?
I think there was an $8 million or $9 million added installation kit. You could see that coming. When you have some idea it's already going to be over $100 million, potentially doubling the cost, wasn't there some obligation to let them know this was not just an add-on but almost double again? I believe part of the problem is that this wasn't signalled.
I'm sensing that you may have had enough information to at least give Treasury Board a heads-up that this was the real number we were looking at, or that it was at least in this ballpark.