All I would say, Mr. Chairman, is that procuring this type of equipment for this type of a situation always has very significant inherent risks as to what is actually available at what time, the kinds of bets people need to make, and the kinds of judgment they need to bring to it.
We made a bet that these vehicles would be available before they obviously were ultimately available. Does it mean that because they were two years late it wasn't a success? We missed our timelines, and I think a lot of people would obviously have liked to have made the timelines. But the military made the adjustments it needed to make sure its soldiers were actually protected in the field. The vehicles are now there, so I would consider that to have been a successful overall procurement.
Did we miss by two years? We missed by two years. Were we happy about that? Absolutely not. Would I actually consider the overall project to have been a success? I would turn to the army for their view on whether the capabilities are actually working and how they managed that two-year space when the vehicles weren't there. But overall, that would be my view.