The second part I can't comment on; it was actually more debate than question, as I think the member knows.
In answer to your question, from what I see, and I stand to be corrected by the clerk, the rules are silent around how we would go about studying the proposed appointment. In the absence of any words providing that parameter, I would likely rule, if that motion were put, that it's in order. If this committee decided that as part of its review it wanted to take extra steps or other steps, I would rule that is within the purview of the committee to decide--recognizing, of course, it's by majority decision. I would not rule it out of order if that motion were placed.
Is there anything further on procedure?
Monsieur Caron.