The first point to make is that we are on the timeline that we indicated. When we undertook to study the matter we set out a goal for the phases we would go through. There was a first phase that involved the production of future-oriented financial statements in departments, and we determined that we were going to do an evaluation thereafter. These steps are progressing; we are not in any way late in terms of the plan we initially set forward. In that sense, the Auditor General continues to seek an early decision, but in point of fact we're on track to make the decision according to the timeline we first set out.
In terms of what that decision may be ultimately, the other key point to realize is that at the same time that we're studying the matter, other countries have been experimenting, and results are coming in from those countries. Frankly, the results are somewhat mixed. It's far from a certainty that accrual appropriations in particular would be automatically a chosen strategy.