Well, sir, as we hire people to fix this problem, we actually increase the administrative costs of the pensions, and reservists expect us to manage the pension plan responsibly as well. So it is not a question.... Frankly, sir, I ask myself the same question. My preference as vice-chief would be to throw 400 people at this problem and clear that backlog in six months. We cannot actually put 400 people on this without attributing the cost of those 400 people to the pension plan. I think the Auditor General would agree with that estimation.
So, sir, as frustrating as it is, throughout this process we have balanced the increase in personnel devoted to this and--notwithstanding a high attrition rate amongst those analysts--increased the number of analysts and their training to tackle the backlog as best we could. We have tried to communicate to reservists why this is a challenge.
I find it frustrating as well, sir, but to characterize our treatment of this issue as not giving a damn about reservists, frankly, I respectfully disagree, sir. It is--