If I could take you to 2.45, about halfway through that piece, you talk about the same MOU of 2006 and point out that the MOU didn't commit Canada to buying the F-35; it was part of that MOU. That was communicated. But what you say is, sir, and I'm reading from your paragraph now:
We did not see evidence they...
and when you say “they”, you're referring to ministers,
...were told that retaining industrial benefits depended on buying the F-35 as a partner in the JSF Program.
So the $12 billion, which you just said to me is an absolute number that perhaps should have been a range—that may be the high end or it should be the lower end—am I correct in reading this that it says if we're not a partner, we don't get those benefits?