I'm trying to give you a way out here, Mr. Fonberg. In 2010—and I'll just pick up on my colleague's point—something changed with the Auditor General's report on the acquisition of the Chinook helicopters. You agreed that the past practices on full life-cycle reporting were not adequate. On what I was trying to help you out with here, if you made a life-cycle acquisition cost in 2008 and 2009, reported it, and got cabinet to use those figures, nobody should be blaming the Department of National Defence for using that in any calculation of F-35 costs prior to 2010, if you were to describe to cabinet that is the way you do business.
When you agreed with the Auditor General's report on the problems with the acquisition of the Chinook aircraft in chapter 6, did you agree that from June 2010 forward you would use a new methodology in reporting to cabinet and to Parliament about life-cycle cost reporting?