There have been, I believe, some references in the U.S. to the fact that if you do some comparisons of the F-35 to an F-18, the cost of maintaining a particular aircraft might be higher.
What that does is it simply means that it raises the types of questions that need to be asked. National Defence may have a perfectly good reason for how that can be offset within their current budget envelope. The problem we have, I think, in terms of those costs is that National Defence for the most part has simply said those costs are in their budget, they're going to be the same, and they haven't provided enough information for people to understand whether that really is an appropriate assumption.
And that's what we feel they need to do: make it clear and defend that assumption that the costs are going to be the same.